🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond the winner overall, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes added after that and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously went for Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over half. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does because then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I think there was significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for the independent. So there existed a little resistance. But no, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.